Essay forms government frederick great - reflective paper topics









essay forms government frederick great

essay forms government frederick greatEssay forms government frederick great -A lower degree of civil freedom, on the contrary, provides the mind with room for each man to extend himself to his full capacity.He then questions, “Why does it not encourage its citizens to put out its faults, and do better than it would have them? The point he is making is that by resisting unjust laws, and showing them their flaws, the people would be helping to create a better government.For an example gives evidence to such a government that in freedom there is not the least cause for concern about public peace and the stability of the community.In this essential dramatic sense, the life of Lincoln is a biographer’s dream.Private use I call that which one may make of it in a particular civil post or office which is entrusted to him.Being an abolitionist, Thoreau was strongly against this war which purpose was to expand slavery into the western states.With a life marked by personal tragedy—he lost his mother at age 9, his only sister at 19, his fiancée at 26, and two children in midlife—Lincoln was prone to intense bouts of depression.Therefore, there are few who have succeeded by their own exercise of mind both in freeing themselves from incompetence and in achieving a steady pace.The life of Abraham Lincoln abounds with dramatic contradiction.Many affairs which are conducted in the interest of the community require a certain mechanism through which some members of the community must passively conduct themselves with an artificial unanimity, so that the government may direct them to public ends, or at least prevent them from destroying those ends.In this respect, this is the age of enlightenment, or the century of Frederick [the Great].But so far as a part of the mechanism regards himself at the same time as a member of the whole community or of a society of world citizens, and thus in the role of a scholar who addresses the public (in the proper sense of the word) through his writings, he certainly can argue without hurting the affairs for which he is in part responsible as a passive member.Thoreau declares that no man should ignore his conscience just to maintain the integrity of the state (2). The citizen cannot refuse to pay the taxes imposed on him; indeed, an impudent complaint at those levied on him can be punished as a scandal (as it could occasion general refractoriness).But on the other hand, we have clear indications that the field has now been opened wherein men may freely deal with these things and that the obstacles to general enlightenment or the release from self-imposed tutelage are gradually being reduced.Statutes and formulas, those mechanical tools of the rational employment or rather misemployment of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting tutelage.He can do this when, with deepest understanding, he lays upon himself the reproach, Caesar non est supra grammaticos [Ceasar is not above the grammarians]." the answer is, "No ," but we do live in an age of enlightenment.After analyzing several documents concerning dissent, I can conclude that one should use civil disobedience to support their conscience and defend their beliefs about unjust laws.He suggests an interesting point by stating, “I saw that, if there was a wall of stone between me and my townsmen, there was a still more difficult one to climb or break through before they could get to be as free as I was” (10).essay forms government frederick greatIt is the freedom to make public use of one's reason at every point. By the public use of one's reason I understand the use which a person makes of it as a scholar before the reading public.through writing, on the erroneous aspects of the present institution.The newly introduced order might last until insight into the nature of these things had become so general and widely approved that through uniting their voices (even if not unanimously) they could bring a proposal to the throne to take those congregations under protection which had united into a changed religious organization according to their better ideas, without, however hindering others who wish to remain in the order.The touchstone of everything that can be concluded as a law for a people lies in the question whether the people could have imposed such a law on itself.But only one who is himself enlightened, is not afraid of shadows, and has a numerous and well-disciplined army to assure public peace, can say: "Argue as much as you will, and about what you will, only obey! Here is shown a strange and unexpected trend in human affairs in which almost everything, looked at in the large, is paradoxical.As nature has uncovered from under this hard shell the seed for which she most tenderly cares -- the propensity and vocation to free thinking -- this gradually works back upon the character of the people, who thereby gradually become capable of acting freely; finally, it affects the principles of government, which finds it to its advantage to treat men, who are now more than machines, in accordance with their dignity.He demonstrated this by refusing to pay poll taxes, which supported the Mexican War.The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history.Martin Luther King, Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, and many others.He has come to be fond of his state, and he is for the present really incapable of making use of his reason, for no one has ever let him try it out.If he only sees to it that all true or alleged improvement stands together with civil order, he can leave it to his subjects to do what they find necessary for their spiritual welfare.Thus it is very difficult for any single individual to work himself out of the life under tutelage which has become almost his nature.In doing this there is nothing that could be laid as a burden on his conscience.He uses a significant metaphor that gives the reader a clear picture of how doing what is right might be hard, but it is still the morally correct choice when he stated, “If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself” (3-4). No permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution and courage to use it without direction from another. That the step to competence is held to be very dangerous by the far greater portion of mankind (and by the entire fair sex) -- quite apart from its being arduous is seen to by those guardians who have so kindly assumed superintendence over them.Born into a Kentucky poverty as obscure as it was desperate, Lincoln died a global icon, mourned by emperors from Brazil to Turkey, and later cherished as an inspiration by Japanese sugar workers in Hawaii and anticolonial activists in Ghana.Here argument is certainly not allowed -- one must obey.And what a people may not decree for itself can even less be decreed for them by a monarch, for his lawgiving authority rests on his uniting the general public will in his own.But that the public should enlighten itself is more likely; indeed, if only freedom is granted, enlightenment is almost sure to follow. essay forms government frederick great But as a scholar, whose writings speak to his public, the world, the clergyman in the public use of his reason enjoys an unlimited freedom to use his own reason to speak in his own person.But to unite in a permanent religious institution which is not to be subject to doubt before the public even in the lifetime of one man, and thereby to make a period of time fruitless in the progress of mankind toward improvement, thus working to the disadvantage of posterity -- that is absolutely forbidden.But would not a society of clergymen, perhaps a church conference or a venerable presbytery (as they call themselves among the Dutch), be justified in obligating itself by oath to a certain unchangeable symbol in order to enjoy an unceasing guardianship over each of its numbers and thereby over the people as a whole, and even to make it eternal? Such contract, made to shut off all further enlightenment from the human race, is absolutely null and void even if confirmed by the supreme power, by parliaments, and by the most ceremonious of peace treaties.If we are asked, "Do we now live in an enlightened age?For himself (and only for a short time) a man may postpone enlightenment in what he ought to know, but to renounce it for posterity is to injure and trample on the rights of mankind.Under him venerable ecclesiastics are allowed, in the role of scholar, and without infringing on their official duties, freely to submit for public testing their judgments and views which here and there diverge from the established symbol.If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source.Henry David Thoreau was a man who strongly believed that much of what the government was doing at the time was morally incorrect.Far more does he injure his own majesty when he degrades his supreme power by supporting the ecclesiastical despotism of some tyrants in his state over his other subjects.This clearly shows that despite the convenience of ignoring one’s conscience, the just decision is always the right decision. But the same person nevertheless does not act contrary to his duty as a citizen, when, as a scholar, he publicly expresses his thoughts on the inappropriateness or even the injustices of these levies, Similarly a clergyman is obligated to make his sermon to his pupils in catechism and his congregation conform to the symbol of the church which he serves, for he has been accepted on this condition.Men work themselves gradually out of barbarity if only intentional artifices are not made to hold them in it.The use, therefore, which an appointed teacher makes of his reason before his congregation is merely private, because this congregation is only a domestic one (even if it be a large gathering); with respect to it, as a priest, he is not free, nor can he be free, because he carries out the orders of another.This is not his concern, though it is incumbent on him to prevent one of them from violently hindering another in determining and promoting this welfare to the best of his ability.Now such religious compact might be possible for a short and definitely limited time, as it were, in expectation of a better.An age cannot bind itself and ordain to put the succeeding one into such a condition that it cannot extend its (at best very occasional) knowledge, purify itself of errors, and progress in general enlightenment.Haunted all his life by a lack of education—as a middle-aged state legislator, he still spelled the word “very” with two R’s—Lincoln is now routinely celebrated as our most literary president, a terse and natural poet of American aspiration.But an example of this failure makes them timid and ordinarily frightens them away from all further trials.Thus the public can only slowly attain enlightenment.This spirit of freedom spreads beyond this land, even to those in which it must struggle with external obstacles erected by a government which misunderstands its own interest. essay forms government frederick great For there will always be some independent thinkers, even among the established guardians of the great masses, who, after throwing off the yoke of tutelage from their own shoulders, will disseminate the spirit of the rational appreciation of both their own worth and every man's vocation for thinking for himself.Nevertheless, he held fast to what can only be called a profoundly optimistic political philosophy, defined by a deep trust in the unity of moral and material progress and a sanguine belief that the “central idea” of American life was the “equality of all men.” Devoting the great bulk of his career to dusty rural courtrooms and quotidian provincial politics, Lincoln ultimately led the country’s greatest political revolution, and soon after its greatest social revolution, too—the bloody transformation of 4 million Americans from property into people. It represents each and every citizen equally whether you are poor or you are rich.For if he believed he had found such in them, he could not conscientiously discharge the duties of his office; he would have to give it up.Perhaps a fall of personal despotism or of avaricious or tyrannical oppression may be accomplished by revolution, but never a true reform in ways of thinking. " Only one prince in the world [Frederick II (the Great) of Prussia] says, "Argue as much as you will, and about what you will, but obey! Which restriction is an obstacle to enlightenment, and which is not an obstacle but a promoter of it?Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.Thoreau points out that the government believes that a revolution would be far worse than the injustice.And an even greater freedom is enjoyed by those who are restricted by no official duties. In a monarchy or dictatorship no one can say or present their point of view.This text is adapted from the collection of the Internet Modern History Sourcebook. They have to follow what a single man says but in democracy we have been granted by RIGHT TO SPEECH.As things now stand, much is lacking which prevents men from being, or easily becoming, capable of correctly using their own reason in religious matters with assurance and free from outside direction.For what he teaches as a consequence of his office as a representative of the church, this he considers something about which he has not freedom to teach according to his own lights; it is something which he is appointed to propound at the dictation of and in the name of another.Civil disobedience is peacefully protesting against laws or governmental demands that are viewed as immoral. Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why so great a portion of mankind, after nature has long since discharged them from external direction (naturaliter maiorennes [those who come of age by virtue of nature]), nevertheless remains under lifelong tutelage, and why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as their guardians. If I have a book that understands for me, a pastor who has a conscience for me, a physician who decides my diet, and so forth, I need not trouble myself.After the guardians have first made their domestic cattle dumb and have made sure that these placid creatures will not dare take a single step without the harness of the cart to which they are tethered, the guardians then show them the danger which threatens if they try to go alone.In jail, he felt free because the state could not hurt or demolish his thoughts, they could only punish his literal body, and being locked in a room did not affect his spirit.A prince who does not find it unworthy of himself to say that he holds it to be his duty to prescribe nothing to men in religious matters but to give them complete freedom while renouncing the haughty name of tolerance, is himself enlightened and deserves to be esteemed by the grateful world and posterity as the first, at least from the side of government, who divested the human race of its tutelage and left each man free to make use of his reason in matters of conscience.A greater degree of civil freedom appears advantageous to the freedom of mind of the people, and yet it places inescapable limitations upon it.But the right to make remarks on errors in the military service and to lay them before the public for judgment cannot equitably be refused him as a scholar. essay forms government frederick great For an example gives evidence to such a government that in freedom there is not the least cause for concern about public peace and the stability of the community. essay forms government frederick great

Status: FreeWare
OS: Windows|Mac OS
Autors 3246
Update: 26-Nov-2017 18:06
Cat: Home »